|
![]() |
Verification
of Forecasts of Tropical Cyclone Activity |
Issued on 15 Jan 2002 |
Our
forecasts for the tropical cyclone (TC) activities for 2001 turned out to be
another success other than the number of TCs making landfall over the South
China coast (see Tables 1, 2 and 3).
Over
the entire western North Pacific, the number of TCs was correctly predicted by
the CSL-6 scheme (the one issued in June,
see Chan et al. 2001) and
also by the CSL-4 scheme (the one issued in
April, see Chan et al. 1998
and Chan et al. 2001)
within the margin of error. As in
the year 2000, two systems (28W and 29W) were considered by the Joint Typhoon
Warning Center (JTWC) as having reached tropical storm intensity but were only
treated as tropical depressions by the Regional Specialized Meteorological
Center (RSMC) in Tokyo. Since we
developed our forecasts based on the JTWC database, our verifications should
also follow their numbers, which means that the CSL-6 scheme was again perfect
and the CSL-4 scheme near perfect. Even
if we use the RSMC-Tokyo data, our forecasts were still correct.
For the number of typhoons, JTWC designated Vamei (32W) as a typhoon but
only for one 6-hourly period. Again,
regardless of the database, our forecasts were again correct.
As stated in the forecasts issued in April 2001, and again, in June 2001,
we predicted a near to above-normal activity, which was exactly what happened.
Over
the South China Sea (SCS), the number of TCs was again correctly predicted
although almost all of them reached at least tropical storm intensity (except
29W, which was not considered a tropical storm by RSMC-Tokyo).
In any case, both the CSL-4 and CSL-6 schemes made the correct
predictions that the TC activity over the SCS was below normal.
For the number of TCs with at least tropical storm intensity, our
predictions were still correct if Vamei was excluded.
This TC formed at ~1oN, which was extremely unusual and no
statistical model would be able to predict the occurrence of such a system. Thus, we would still maintain that our predictions were
within the margin of error.
The
other "failure" in the forecasts for 2001 is in the number of TCs
making landfall along the South China coast.
The TC that ruined the statistic was Nari that traversed the Island of
Taiwan before turning westward to make landfall along the northern coast of
south China. This was a very
unusual storm. It made several
loops to the northeast of Taiwan, then moved south along the Central Mountain
Range without much weakening. Statistical
models would not be able to predict such systems.
It is therefore fair to say that we did correctly predict the number of
landfalling TCs to be below normal. In
10 out of the 15 years in which the number of landfalling TCs is above normal,
they tend to occur in later months (August and beyond).
In 2001, most of the TCs that made landfall occurred in July.
To summarize, we consider our forecasts to be a near-complete success for 2001. We also made correct predictions for 2000. Therefore, it appears that our schemes may be working well. However, some of our recent research on ENSO suggests that we might have overlooked some factors that determine whether a cold event would transition to a warm one. In fact, we might be issuing our ENSO outlook within the next few weeks.
The
forecasts for TC activity in 2002 will be issued in mid April 2002.
Chan, J. C. L., J. E. Shi and C. M. Lam,
1998: Seasonal forecasting of tropical
cyclone activity over the western North Pacific and the South China Sea. Wea.
Forecasting, 13, 997-1004.
Chan, J.
C. L., J. E. Shi and K. S. Liu, 2001: Improvements in the seasonal forecasting
of tropical cyclone activity over the western North Pacific. Wea.
Forecasting, 16, 491-498. Abstract
Table 1.
Forecasts of TC activity in 2001 using the CSL-4 and CSL-6
schemes.
2001 |
Forecast | Observed | Normal | |
| CSL-4 | CSL-6 | |||
|
Western North Pacific |
||||
| No. of TCs | 31
|
32
|
32 | 31 |
| No. of TCs with at least tropical storm intensity | 27
|
28
|
28 (26) | 27 |
| No. of typhoons | 18
|
18
|
20 (19) | 17 |
|
South China Sea |
||||
| No. of TCs | 10
|
11
|
12 | 13 |
| No. of TCs with at least tropical storm intensity | 9
|
9
|
12 (11) | 10 |
| No. of TCs making landfall along the South China coast | 3
|
3
|
5 | 5 |
Note: Numbers in parentheses are the observed TC numbers if the RSMC-Tokyo data are used.
Table 2. 2001 summary of tropical cyclones over the western North Pacific.
|
Western North Pacific (including South China Sea) |
|||
|
2001 |
Tropical cyclones | Tropical cyclones with at least tropical storm intensity | Tropical cyclones with typhoon intensity |
| 01. 01W (no name) 02. 02W (no name) 03. Cimaron 04. Chebi 05. Durian 06. Utor 07. Trami 08. 08W (no name) 09. Kong-rey 10. Yutu 11. Toraji 12. Man-yi 13. Usagi 14. Pabuk 15. 15W (no name) 16. Wutip 17. Sepat 18. Fitow 19. Danas 20. Nari 21. Vipa 22. Francisco 23. Lekima 24. Krosa 25. Haiyan 26. Podul 27. Lingling 28. 28W (no name)* 29. 29W (no name)* 30. Kajiki 31. Faxai 32. Vamei |
01. Cimaron 02. Chebi 03. Durian 04. Utor 05. Trami 06. Kong-rey 07. Yutu 08. Toraji 09. Man-yi 10. Usagi 11. Pabuk 12. Wutip 13. Sepat 14. Fitow 15. Danas 16. Nari 17. Vipa 18. Francisco 19. Lekima 20. Krosa 21. Haiyan 22. Podul 23. Lingling 24. 28W (no name)* 25. 29W (no name)* 26. Kajiki 27. Faxai 28. Vamei
|
01. Chebi
|
|
| * The TD was considered by JTWC as having reached tropical storm intensity # Vamei was considered by JTWC as having reached typhoon intensity |
|||
| Total number | 32 | 28 (26) | 20 (19) |
| Predicted number (issued in April) |
31 |
27 |
18 |
| Predicted number (issued in June) |
32 |
28 |
18 |
Note: Numbers in parentheses are the observed TC numbers if the RSMC-Tokyo data are used.
Table 3. 2001 summary of tropical cyclones over the South China Sea and making landfall along the South China coast.
|
South China Sea |
|||
| Tropical cyclones | Tropical cyclones with at least tropical storm intensity | Tropical cyclones making landfall along the South China coast | |
| 01. Cimaron 02. Chebi 03. Durian 04. Utor 05. Yutu 06. Usagi 07. Fitow 08. Nari 09. Lingling 10. 29W 11. Kajiki 12. Vamei |
01. Cimaron 02. Chebi 03. Durian 04. Utor 05. Yutu 06. Usagi 07. Fitow 08. Nari 09. Lingling 10. 29W 11. Kajiki 12. Vamei |
01. Durian 02. Utor 03. Yutu 04. Fitow 05. Nari
|
|
| Total number | 12 | 12 (11) | 5 |
| Predicted number (issued in April) |
10 |
9 |
3
|
| Predicted number (issued in June) |
11 |
9 |
3
|
Note: Numbers in parentheses are the observed TC numbers if the RSMC-Tokyo data are used.